First semi final
- If the televoters were to decide, we would have seen Finland in the final, but the jury could have kicked out Russia. Oh well, win some, lose some.
- Portugal was ranked second by the jury. WTF? Corruption!
- Estonia would have made it if only the jury were to decide. Makes us want the jury to stay with us for next year anyway.
- It was the jury that kicked Sweden out. Well done, jury.
- Lithuania would have made it if only the televoters were to decide. What happened to the jury there?
- The televoters would have made sure we missed that hideous Irish dress for the final. We now know to blame the jury.
- The televoters disliked Didrik even more than the jury. Not so surprising, as Didrik wasn't really trying to reach and please the audience outside of his performances.
- Spain is a lot higher in the televoting rank than in the jury voting. Probably a lot of votes of sympathy for the attacked there - and maybe some for Daniel's bright smile?
- Denmark was ranked lower by the jury than by the televoters. Well, at least the jury is a little bit smarter than the rest.
- Israel was a lot more popular with the jury than with the televoters. We get that, because while Harel himself is an instant hit, the song kinda needs to grow on you.
- France was popular among the dancing televoters, while the party pooping jury even preferred knitted sweaters of Russia over hot asses of France. Choose a better jury next time!
- UK ended up last in all lists. Poor little Josh.
Do we want to do a close analysis showing some political tendency or to make up our mind about the jury vs televoting system? Nope, no way. Because that would ruin some of the Eurovisional magic: The surprises that always show up and the predictions that are never completely right. We can't wait to see what happens next year. Keep on voting, folks.
No comments:
Post a Comment